June 8, 2026

8 thoughts on “Ten Reasons Why Uhuru Kenyatta Will Never Rescue William Ruto From His ICC Problems

  1. Ifijo, congratulation for the well done analysis .What is Ruto doing in TelAviv with Netanyahu ,bibi.?

  2. The 10 reasons ODM believes Uhuru ‘fixed’ Ruto at ICC

    BY ODM
    October 9, 2015

    As a party, we believe truth and honesty are the best tools with which to govern a nation. We detest politics of lies, misinformation and mere survival.

    We therefore reluctantly return to the matter of the case facing Deputy President William Ruto and Joshua Sang at The Hague because we believe this nation needs to be set free and only the truth shall set us free.

    We are here to restate the position we took this week that President Uhuru Kenyatta was fully aware of and funded the procuring of witnesses against Ruto.

    We also restate that contrary to what Jubilee is saying, Uhuru has done nothing to make sure the case facing Ruto, ends in Ruto’s favour.

    Here are our reasons. They are ten in number.

    1. [Gatundu South MP] Moses Kuria has confessed that he procured and coached witnesses against William Ruto in 2008.

    At that time, Kuria was an employee of Uhuru. Uhuru had seconded him to the PNU presidential campaign which Uhuru had joined when he agreed to support Mwai Kibaki’s bid for a second term.

    After the 2007 elections, Kuria joined the UK Centre which was the headquarters of Uhuru’s political activities.

    He continued to work there until he was elected MP. Kuria was always an employee and agent of Uhuru in procuring and coaching witnesses against Ruto.

    2. Kuria claims that PNU is the one that funded the procuring and coaching of witnesses.

    We all know that immediately after the elections, the bank accounts of PNU were looted by its officials and cronies of President Kibaki.

    PNU was left broke. It never paid its suppliers for campaign materials orits employees after the election. It had no money to conduct the exercise of procuring witnesses which Kuria was engaged in. The money for procuring witnesses came from the UK Centre.

    3. The head of the UK Centre was David Murathe, who is currently the JAP Vice Chairman.

    The UK Centre employed Kuria and funded the procuring and coaching of the witnesses. Murathe is one of Uhuru’s closest confidants.

    Uhuru cannot therefore claim to be ignorant of what Murathe and Kuria were doing.

    4. Very critical evidence against Ruto was supplied by the then Director of Intelligence Michael Gichangi. He testified on July 21, 2008 and gave dossier that named and implicated Ruto.

    The ICC Pre-trial Chamber relied a lot on the evidence supplied by Gichangi to confirm the charges against Ruto.

    Later, Gichangi’s name was submitted to the ICC as one of the witnesses for Uhuru’s case. This made it clear who Gichangi was working for all along. On this matter of ICC, Gichangi was working for Uhuru.

    5. In November 2013, long after Ruto and URP had assisted Uhuru to become president, Ruto asked Uhuru to let him have evidence held by NIS.

    The evidence was to assist Ruto in his defense. Uhuru refused, even despite the fact that Ruto was now DP and entitled to receive any information he needed from NIS.

    The information Ruto needed was in the custody of Gichangi but they would not allow Ruto to have it.

    6. When the ICC named Ambassador Francis Muthaura, then the Head of the Civil Service, as a suspect, the government shopped for a lawyerto represent Muthaura.

    That lawyer was Karim Khan. Khan was sourced for and retained by the government and the PNU/Uhuru faction of suspects.

    After the charges against Ruto were confirmed, the Pnu/Uhuru faction convinced Ruto that Karim Khan was the lawyer that would help him and that he should reject ODM’s offer of George Oraro who had managed to free Henry Kosgey.

    Until this day, Karim is paid by Uhuru and his government and Ruto’s case keeps going from bad to worse.

    7. Jendayi Frazer, the then Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs in the United States Government, came to Kenya as early as January 5, 2008, at the height of the Post Election Violence.

    Frazer is a close family friend of the Kenyattas. She spends most of her time in Kenya, with the Kenyattas. Frazer went to school with Uhuru’s siblings.

    Frazer was very instrumental in getting ICC to take on the Kenyan cases. But she turned against the international court when they also indicted Uhuru.

    After she left State Department in 2009, she dedicated her time to fighting the ICC on Uhuru’s behalf, calling the case against him “a weak one based on hearsay”, and saying the “ICC has fallen from high ideals of global justice and accountability”.

    Ever since Uhuru’s case was dropped, Frazer no longer fights the ICC and is quite happy with the court continuing with the prosecution of Ruto.

    On his part Uhuru has not seen the need to ask Frazer to help Ruto. In fact, all the international lobbyists who had been retained by the government to help fight the ICC have been stood down ever since Uhuru’s case collapsed.

    When Uhuru visited New York late last month, two of the lobbyists who helped with his case sought audience with him to figure out if they could be of service to Ruto. Uhuru never granted them audience.

    8. One of greatest challenges of Ruto’s case at the ICC is Rule 68 that allowed the prosecutor to introduce recanted evidence.

    This Rule was passed by the Assembly of State Parties with the full consent of Kenya through foreign secretary Amina Muhammed.

    The government was not worried about Rule 68 because all Uhuru’s witnesses had already died or disappeared. Rule 68 was NOT going to affect Uhuru.

    Instead, the government was only worried about amending Rule 134 so that Uhuru could be exempted from having to attend trial and allowed the use of video technology for trials.

    When questioned about how Kenya had handled these amendments, Amina said everything had been done in the spirit of “give and take.”

    It is clear someone was being given away and another one was taking their freedom. The question then is, give to who? Take away from whom?

    Later, after Rule 68 had been successfully used against Ruto, Amina Mohammed started a flurry of activities to have the Rule reviewed by the Assembly of State Parties.

    Of course this is not possible since Kenya consented to it in the first place.In fact, since Uhuru’s case collapsed, Kenya has resumed paying its dues to the ICC faithfully, unlike when Uhuru’s case was active.

    The current campaign is therefore an exercise in futility to cover the eyes of Ruto’s supporters and give them false hope.

    9. Despite being described as “doing a good job for the President and his Deputy” at The Hague, Ambassador Ruthie Ronowas removed by Uhuru as High Commissioner for Kenya to The Hague.

    Ambassador Rono is from Ruto’s Kalenjin Community. She had been at The Hague since the Kenyan cases began. There was every reason to retain Rono at The Hague especially while Ruto’s case is going on.

    Instead, Ambassador Rono was removed and replaced by a junior diplomat, Ambassador Rose Muchiri, from Uhuru’s Kikuyu community, just when Kenya needed its best and experienced diplomat at The Hague.

    10. At the height of the case against Uhuru, the TNA brigade in Jubilee started the move to withdraw Kenya from the ICC.

    Ever since Uhuru’s case was dropped; nothing has been heard of this again. Uhuru sponsored a motion at the African Union seeking to have an international Criminal Court for Africa to replace the IC. The motion was adopted.

    Uhuru even paid US$ 1 million from Kenya to the AU to start the process. Ever since his case collapsed, Uhuru has not spoken on that issue again.

    We have no option to conclude that Uhuru Kenyatta did everything to get Ruto to The Hague and has done nothing to get Ruto out of The Hague.

    God Help Kenya.
    – See more at: http://www.the-star.co.ke/news/10-reasons-odm-believes-uhuru-fixed-ruto-icc#sthash.50JI1qFy.dpuf

  3. UHURU indirectly tells RUTO and KALENJINs to leave Jubilee if they are ‘uncomfortable’

    Thursday October 15, 2015 – President Uhuru Kenyatta has indirectly told Deputy President William Ruto to leave Jubilee Alliance if he is ‘uncomfortable’ with how things are going on in the ruling coalition.

    Delivering the message to Ruto on Wednesday via KTN, Jubilee Alliance activist, Tonny Gachoka, said Ruto and Kalenjin MPs are holding Uhuru hostage and “enough is enough”.

    Gachoka told Ruto and Kalenjins to stop the ICC rhetoric that he was fixed by Uhuru saying Ruto should clear his name the way President Uhuru Kenyatta did without blaming somebody for his woes.

    “Uhuru cleared his name in the ICC, DP Ruto should do that as well,” Gachoka, who is currently Jubilee’s spanner boy, said.

    “If Kalenjins think they gonna blackmail Uhuru with this fixing shenanigans, then we (read Mt Kenyan natives) will tell them to bring it on,” Gachoka said.

    Gachoka was speaking during an interview with Jeff Koinange on JKL live.

    The Kenyan DAILY POST

  4. Marry a Kikuyu woman at your risk.If you are msungu(whiteman) A kikuyu wife will eat your testicles alive&left you dry.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from KENYA STOCKHOLM BLOG

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading