June 7, 2026

24 thoughts on “Drama as Odero and Midenyo are Attacked by a Kikuyu Woman at Keegan’s Funeral Meeting

  1. Atleast u stayed positive. Don’t let cheap mind control u. U were there for keegan n not tribal things. U r focusing too much on kikuyu who was negative while its another kikuyu woman who was positive. The sprit of kenyanism in Stockholm prevails above all this.

  2. Poleni Ndugu, the last paragraph smacks racism,hate and probably the highest level of tribalism perpetrated by tribalists in Stockholm infested with hate btw Kikuyus and Luos in recent times . Kenyans residing in EU/USA countries should be the ones showing the way .How people can live peacefully and happily in a democracy ,and perhaps export democratic principles back home. Lets not try to distract keegan’s friend from attending his final destination he never chose. May God grant everyone his love and be blessed,peace and harmony. Rip Keegan .You were a friend of mine, and to many who value true friendship.May the Lord be with you.

  3. Why dont you guys blame the Chairman who according to the story failed to steer clear the meeting and the bad behaviour perpetrated by the ill-advised primitive kikuyu women.The Chairman should have asked the aggresive woman to leave so that the meeting should have proceeded without any disturbance.

  4. I think its high time the ethinic differences were sorted out here in Stockholm. I do believe its the only city in the whole world where we were left pointing”thats a kikuyu, thats a luo” .Back at home luo land is full of kikuyus and kikuyu land is full of luos . Here in sweden it’s only that there is law and order which governs the state otherwise it would have been worse that 2008 PEV.All we need is respect for each other .

  5. As a veteran Kenya-Stockholmer, I felt inclined to comment on what is being termed and seen as a struggle between the Luo and Kikuyu communities in Stockholm. I personally do not have a problem with other people that switch to their vernacular languages in a gathering, even if I am present and do not understand what they are saying. It may be terrible manners or even anti-social, but I would hardly see it as or label it an attempt to sideline me tribally. If I felt uncomfortable with the change in language, I would request these individuals to speak in either English or Swahili if they were to continue to enjoy my company. I would certainly leave if they then failed to comply with my request. It would be ridiculous to begin throwing accusations at them, labeling them tribalists or claim that they are aiding and abetting with unseen forces to sideline me because I was not from their tribe. Only a singularly paranoid individual that sees tribalists in every shadow that moves, or a bona-fide hardcore tribalist in the guise of being cosmopolitan would resort to such antics. To speak and enjoy speaking ones language is a basic human right. There is no shame or crime in doing so, and therefore one cannot be reproached for it. Luo’s and Kikuyu’s, and other Kenyan communities for that matter, have no apologies to make to anyone when they speak their languages in public or private forums, it is their cultural heritage in all its beauty and uniqueness.

    The Kenyan community in Stockholm is morning the passing of Keegan Kagwe, a cosmopolitan Kenyan known by Kenyans across the ethnic divide. You could never have called this man a tribalist. We all choose our friends by seeking out those that share our values and ideals, and Keegan was no exception. It is therefore safe to assume that his friends were also cosmopolitan in their nature. It is these friends, with the exception of a few self-invited guests, that congregated at his apartment to commiserate with each other and be there for Keegan’s family at this time. When Jared Odero alludes in his KSB posting that these friends would encourage or harbor a tribal agenda is in extremely bad taste, utter rubbish and is illuminative of a skewered perception. I personally think the Chairman of the committee acted wisely and appropriately given the circumstances. Jared’s exchange with the person he refers to as “the woman stranger” disintegrated into behind the scene altercations, all the while expecting the intervention of the Chairman. Jared needs to understand the old adage, “If you argue with a fool, nobody will notice the difference”, the Chairman certainly seems to have done so by ignoring the both of them and leaving them to their own devices. I wonder what would have transpired if he had chosen to ask the Chairman to conduct the meeting in English or Swahili, and ignored “the woman stranger” whose behavior he found provocative. We will never know. Jared’s actions at the meeting however are indicative of his complete lack of judgment and an enormous ego that was dented by the apparent lack of recognition as per his so called “prominent personality” status. If Jared was not man enough to bring up the issue at the meeting with the Chairman and take the bull by the horns, his subsequent post on the incident on KSB only serves to increase perceptions of a widening tribal divide in Stockholm.

  6. M. O.

    You were not at the meeting and thus the biased response to suit your usual selfish ego. The usage of the Kikuyu language was pointed on by Midenyo but that was ignored. In fact a member said: “Odero understands Kikuyu”.

    The rest of your post is slanted and has taken a “personal angle” which is your usual way whenever you notice my take on local issues. Keep it up.

  7. Odero, I last posted on KSB more than 3 years ago and the idea of me being on a vendetta, being biased or writing with a “personal angle” is plainly ludicrous. Furthermore “your take on local issues” appears to be confined to the vilification of one particular ethnic group in your numerous posts. Those trying to heckle me into silence using fictitious stories and pretended bravado should strive to redouble these efforts because they really need to sharpen their wits. Then perhaps I just may be inclined to give a response.

  8. M.O, Really? Three years ago is when you posted at KSB? Tell it to the birds!

    As I mentioned in my earlier response, you have a knack for diverting from the topic at hand. You were not at Keegan’s place and much of your initial misinterpretation is based on your online hatred for me, which you have never hidden. Your language remains the same even if you acquire other handles. Right from your first response, you shifted the thread to a personal level because that is how low your twisted mind works.

    If you have a problem with my articles at KSB, then challenge them on the basis of their content instead of writing rubbish about me. All parties who were at Keegan’s place apart from the stranger woman, gave there unbiased account of the incident which Osewe posted. I have also moved on and have asked all Kenyans to support Keegan’s funeral arrangements.

    I don’t socialize or mix with you in any way, apart from sharing the common trait of being a Kenyan; so stop your skewed thoughts about me. You won’t gag me with your drivel because I have my global citizen’s rights of expression at KSB.

    Seek Divine help to “exorcise” those demons of ethnic hatred from your head. Amen!

  9. Turkana Must stop attacking kikuyus un-armed women with children ?(selecting kikuyus) while armed Policemen are watching without interfeering>

  10. Kamanda tells Kikuyus to marry from other tribes

    ..

    Tuesday, December 3, 2013 – 00:00 — BY NJENGA GICHEHA

    Starehe MP Maina Kamanda has called on Kikuyu youth to intermarry with other tribes to promote national cohesion.

    Kamanda said intermarriages can help heal the country’s ethnic rifts.

    He was speaking in Murang’a on Sunday during a pre-ceremony for Muriithi Mwenje, the son of the late Embakasi MP David Mwenje who is also the parliamentary Committee on Roads and Infrastructure,

    Muriithi, a lawyer is due to marry Laura, his high school sweetheart from Kisii. The wedding will be held on December 14 in Nairobi.

    “I would like to tell our young men and women that it’s good to marry from other tribes. They should work hard to get others from even Kisii land and bring here and other should go there,” said Kamanda.

    The MP said it is the pride of leaders in the country to see their children marry from different communities to create a generational co-existence.

    “This is very important especially to us as leaders. Every leader wants his or her daughter to get married so that we can have more people in the family like my son also should get married,” he said.

    Kamanda added, “we don’t want our girls to continue saying that poor young men are drunkards and they are not responsible. There is no one time a man would be responsible when you look at others.”

    He cautioned the young people against blaming each other as being weak and urged them to embrace community responsibility.

    “Our men on the other hand say that the girls even from other tribes are very expensive but I would like to tell the men to be serious. Life without a husband, a wife and children is useless. So let’s start making families,” said Kamanda.

  11. Carter Center quietly publishes strikingly critical Final Report from Kenya 2013 Election Observation

    Posted on November 24, 2013

    Without additional fanfare that I have picked up on, the Carter Center published on the web on October 16th their Final Report on the Election Observation Mission for Kenya’s March 4 election.

    I admit to being pleasantly surprised upon wading through the details to find much more direct acknowledgment of the shortcomings of the process, especially the tallying and reporting of results, than I would have expected from the previous media reporting on the various communications about this observation mission over the months since the vote, as well as a major change in conclusions.

    Read it for yourself if you are interested in Kenyan elections and the extent to which the announced presidential result in this most recent election was or wasn’t reliable, but the bottom line here is that the Carter Center has commendably stepped back from their previous assurance from April 4, a month after the election, that “in spite of serious shortcomings” the IEBC’s improvised paper-based tally process “presented enough guarantees to preserve the expression of the will of the Kenyan voters”. In the Final Report the tally/tabulation process is discussed in Pages 51-58, concluding in summary, “Overall, Kenya partially fulfilled its obligations to ensure that the will of the people, as expressed through the ballot box, is accurately recorded and communicated.” (p. 57).

    The report itemizes and discusses five categories of “Challenges in Tabulation”:

    I. Failure of Electronic Transmission of Provisional Results

    II. Inadequate Publication of Tabulation Procedures

    . . . .

    Therefore, the available instructions appeared to be insufficient to guarantee the integrity and accuracy of numerical tabulation. . . . (p. 54)

    III. Inadequate Observer and Election Agent Access to National Tally Center

    . . . .

    However, the national tally center did not provide enough transparency for observers or party agents to assess the overall integrity of tally of presidential results. Unfortunately, the Center regrets the IEBC decision to confine party agents and observers to the gallery of the national tally center, making effective and meaningful observation impossible.

    The Center observed many of the same kind of discrepancies in the tally procedures that had generated so much criticism and speculation in 2007; results announced at the national tally center differed from those announced at constituency level, missing tally forms, inconsistencies between presidential and parliamentary tallies, instances of more votes than registered voters, discrepancies between turnouts of the presidential and parliamentary elections, and expulsion of party agents from the tally space at the national tally center.

    . . . . (p. 54, footnotes omitted)

    IV. Discrepancies Between the Published Voter Register and Announced Results

    The Center’s examination of reported final results for the presidential election, recorded on form 36, showed noteworthy discrepancies. . . . (p. 55)

    V. Nonpublication of Detailed Election Results

    One of Kenya’s core obligations concerns promoting transparency in elections and other public processes. . . . The Center remains concerned that the IEBC has not published detailed official results disaggregated at the polling station level. (p.55)

    For more information, although not cited by the Carter Center, please see the audit performed by the Mars Group Kenya, noting the “missing” status of the Form 34s recording the tallies from each of 2,627 polling streams.

    See Africa Confidential: “Carter’s quiet doubts“.

    Previously:

    *Are “free and fair” elections passé in Kenya?

    *Carter Center calls it as they see it in the DRC

    *Why would we trust the Kenyan IEBC vote tally when they engaged in fraudulent procurement practices for key technology?
    http://africommons.com/2013/11/24/carter-center-quietly-publishes-strikingly-critical-final-report-from-kenya-2013-election-observation/

    http://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/news/peace_publications/election_reports/kenya-final-101613.pdf

Leave a Reply

Discover more from KENYA STOCKHOLM BLOG

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading