June 8, 2026

15 thoughts on “Meet the Nifty Luo Bull Boffing his Cute Kikuyu Missus and She Rocks!

  1. The Luo – Kikuyu divide is more than political
    Otieno Kenyatta

    When two bulls fight, the grass feels the heat. The scenario (let me not call it bad blood) between the Luo and Kikuyu in this country is peculiar to Kenya. When these two tribes find a reason to work together, Kenya jumps major huddles- but only for as long as the ‘marriage’ lasts. These two communities can decide to unite and share the presidency between them for long, may be their ‘animosity’ is a blessing in disguise to ‘small’ tribes.

    The Luo – Kikuyu divide is more than political
    When two bulls fight, the grass feels the heat. The scenario (let me not call it bad blood) between the Luo and Kikuyu in this country is peculiar to Kenya. When these two tribes find a reason to work together, Kenya jumps major huddles- but only for as long as the ‘marriage’ lasts. These two communities can decide to unite and share the presidency between them for long, may be their ‘animosity’ is a blessing in disguise to ‘small’ tribes.

    In my attempt to try and get a solution for Kenya, I have realized that the difference is more than political. It is engrained in the DNA of the two communities; there are many fundamental differences that will have to be bridged before the political difference is solved. I will speak as an outsider though I acknowledge I am a Luo with two names from both communities.

    Kikuyus are generally farmers while Luos are originally cattle keepers. The two cultures have followed the two tribes to the city and into the diaspora. The Kikuyus like all farmers are patient- they will invest (plant) and wait for the season of harvesting. The Luos who are pastoralists turned fishermen, are used to going to the cattle shed or the lake, fish out what is available and feast for the day.

    The Kikuyu are used to seasons of crop failure so they will save for the dry season. The Luo on the other hand are used to living one day at a time. Cattle is slaughtered, dried for preservation or eaten fresh as a community. They will go fishing everyday and not miss what to eat, the lake is a constant. Now you know why Kikuyus are good investors and Luos good spenders.

    Politically, when Kikuyus get into positions of power they fence it off like all farmers. They slot their henchmen in vital positions and begin the process of cultivating and harvesting. The pastoralists like Moi regime would graze down a government project then move in search of greener pastures to feed on again. Fishermen would put in the structures (nets) and exploit the catch day in and wait for retirement.

    Another main difference is that Luos are patriarchal while Kikuyus are matriarchal. This is evident from the fact that many women MPs to ever grace the august house are from the Kikuyu community. To the Kikuyu, the children belong to the mother, while to the Luos the children are called by their father’s name. If Barack Obama was a Kikuyu, he would not care about his ancestral roots.

    The other factor is how to attain results. While Luo children are raised to love excellence and guard their reputation, Kikuyu bring up their children with the balance sheet in mind. It does not matter how you earn your money- rich people are respected. Watch a Luo and a Kikuyu carpenter, the Luo would rather make flashy furniture and keep it for months- enjoying the glamour. The Kikuyu will make average pieces and sell many at a reasonable price.

    The food Luos eat must be prepared to a certain standard. If someone cooks food that does not match the ‘lifestyle’ it will be called kikuyu food. Kikuyus on the other hand do not mind the quality; they will mix the food, boil and serve. They would rather spend time looking for money than eating good food.

    I always tell people that former MP Njenga Karume should thank God he was not born a Luo, he would never have seen the inside of parliament. Luos will respect a poor professor and even elect him to parliament at the expense of a wealthy opponent. Education matters a lot, not just attaining it but even where you get it matters. So a Maseno University graduate will not ‘speak’ where a University of Nairobi graduate is.

    Luos abhor blood- it takes a Luo more than guts to murder someone in cold blood. On the flip side, they are ruthless with people who do not tow the ‘upright’ social order. The thieves and conmen of Kisumu will never live in peace when identified. The people will come and get a thief from his mother’s house if they have to. On the flip side, Kikuyus will defend their kith and kin as long as it was a matter of earning some money. I have a hunch that if Mungiki was a Luo outfit it would have been annihilated, not by the state but the community.

    Raila’s son Fidel in an interview with Kwach and Angwenyi on Easy FM said that his grandfather’s parting shot to them was “do not bring down my name.” To the Luo, the name matters a lot, reputation is guarded at all costs unlike the Kikuyu’s. Then there is the engrained socialism/capitalism divide. Urbanization has thrown the Luo socialism into an imbalance. The Kikuyu had their socialism broken down by colonial displacements and they adopted capitalism.

    There has been a tremendous increase in Luo-Kikuyu intermarriages recently. I believe this will form a middle ground where the two communities can bridge their differences. The political differences stem from an inbuilt engrained culture. Whenever these marriages work you see a very stable and developed home. Even when it is a business partnership, the cultural mix just takes the venture to great heights. Luos are good managers while Kikuyus are risk takers.

    The Raila-Kibaki generation will not sort it, but the younger generation can find a reason to agree to disagree. Like in a marriage, you accept your spouse at their best and worst. Unlike poles attract, and each has traits the other lacks but needs. The problem is the supremacy ego between the two- it must be sorted soon if we are to achieve Vision 2030.

    I urge the government and the ministry of education in particular to work out a formula of sorting this problem. Nyanza and Central can exchange students and the students who agree to take up the placements be put on scholarships. This interaction may give rise to a different generation of Kikuyus and Luos which will be good for Kenya.

  2. Kikuyu watatawala Kenya Milele juu ya Uchenzi ya Makabila cheap shit-pit wa Kenya Bona Ma-vi ya kikuyu ha-ya-nu-ki!After meeting the PM, Gichangi and Kimaiyo attended the country’s top security organ — National Security Advisory Committee (NSAC) meeting. NSAC sitting that late in the evening urged Raila and his running mate in March 4 race, Vice-President Kalonzo Musyoka, to suspend their rallies saying they could trigger violence.

    The committee, which is chaired by Head of Civil Service, Francis Kimemia, also declared it would not allow the meetings to continue as planned. Other Members of the committee are Permanent Secretaries Mutea Iringo (Internal security), Thuita Mwangi (Foreign), Nancy Kirui (Defence), and Attorney General Githu Muigai. Apart from Gichangi, and Kimaiyo, the two Deputy Inspector Generals of Police – Grace Kaindi and Samuel Arachi – also sit in it

  3. Focus on tribalism in Kenya

    Alan E Masakhalia

    Tribalism in Kenya is responsible for underdevelopment, corruption, the rigging of elections and violence. What can its background tell us about the future risks of Kenyan tribalism, and how to put an end to it?

    Tribalism in Kenya is not a historical inevitability. It cannot be traced to ancient hatreds or warfare from cultures clashing over the ages. In fact, the major opposing groups, the westerners ( Luo, Luhya, Kalenjin, Kisii) of western Kenya and the GEMA (Kikuyu, Embu and Meru people) from the Mount Kenya area, had little contact with one another before the coming of the colonialists. Accordingly, Kenya’s tribalism is a relatively new phenomenon. It is a product of modern times arising from colonialism, urbanization and the political culture that sprung up in independent Kenya.

    Before the coming of the colonialists Kenyan tribes lived in their own distinct areas with their own cultures, i.e. language, customs, myths of origin etc. The communities lived free from each other, save for some conflict over water and pasture for livestock.

    When the British came, they brought with them the principle of divide and rule. They magnified differences amongst the various communities/ tribes, instigating clashes whereby each community distrusted and fought the other. This served as the breeding ground for negative tribal stereotypes which then became embedded in popular belief. The Kikuyu for example were given the impression that the fish-eating Luo’s were lazy, uncircumcised and unreliable while the Luhya’s were made to view the GEMA communities as schemers, liars, untrustworthy, arrogant and so forth.

    This situation of suspicion persisted till the time when independence was realized in 1963, at which point tribal suspicions shot up as the two major parties KADU (Kenya African Democratic Union) and KANU (Kenya African National Union) began squabbling over power. KANU was a party largely dominated by two tribes, the Kikuyu and the Luo. KADU on the other hand was a coalition of all the other small Kenyan tribes that feared being dominated by the Kikiyu/Luo alliance under KANU.

    KADU insisted on “majimbo”- a federal system of governance tbat they argued twas the only way to protect the smaller tribes from domination by the majority tribes (Kikuyu and Luo). However, KANU carried the day and federalism was discarded, in its place, Kenya adopted the unitary system of governance.

    The unity between the Luo’s and the Kikuyu’s was short lived, since immediately Mzee Jomo Kenyatta (a Kikuyu) became president his administration started favouring the Kikuyu people. This favouritism manifested itself in greater government expenditures for social infrastructure in Kikuyu areas, corruption benefits to fellow tribesmen, privileged access to government and parastatal jobs. The Luo on the other hand, despite holding the vice presidency, were largely discriminated against, their complaints only eliciting intimidation and even assassinations in return.

    Under the Mzee Jomo Kenyatta government, it was common to have many underqualified staff from the Kikuyu community placed in positions of higher authority than the qualified ones from other tribes. This led to the final falling out with government as the vice president Oginga (a Luo), was eventually pushed out of government and detained. The tribal rift was widened and solidified when a Luo minister who had remained in government was assassinated; Mr.Tom Mboya’s assassination was blamed on highly placed Kikuyu personalities. This was seen as an assault on the Luo by the Kikuyu, and since then Kenyan politics has essentially pitted Kikuyu against Luos, with each side attempting to attract other tribal groups to its side.

    The consequences of tribalism

    Tribalism in Kenya is indeed a major stumbling block to democracy as well as socio-economic development. It persists since it provides an avenue via which state goodies and favours trickle down from those in power to their tribesmen. Therefore, loyalty to tribe is given ever greater relevance than loyalty to the country.

    Tribalism is responsible for a lot of ills such as underdevelopment, corruption, rigging of elections and violence/civil war. There is also no meritocracy as people are given jobs based on tribe regardless of having low qualifications. Hence the inefficient use of available skills. The exploitation of natural resources also takes a tribal angle, with resources in some areas being ignored or being under utilized. Bad governance and lack of accountability is also linked to tribalism as people will never question a government run by their tribesmen: even if it makes mistakes they remain supportive of it firmly and blindly.The reverse is also true. This means that even if a government does well it will receive daily unnecessary criticism from the tribes not in the ruling party.

    Tribalism is thus used to withhold or provide preferential services and resources.

    Thanks to tribalism, citizens are now questioning the call for Peace, Love and Unity. They ask for whom is this unity, peace for whom? For whose benefit? Rival tribes? Tribal clashes/ethic violence is a common occurrence in Kenya as in most African countries such as Rwanda, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Zimbabwe etc. There is animosity, distrust and hatred amongst various tribes so that even intermarriages among some tribes are strongly discouraged by the older conservative generation as well as the rural folk.

    The Luhya for example have a proverb which says “elisimba lifwitsanga mulikobi lya lyasie’’ meaning that a mongoose dies on behalf of another mongoose. For example if a snake bites you, you kill any or all other snakes that you come across – you don’t sit back and look for the exact one that bit you. In a tribal context, if I am harmed by a Kikuyu, then whichever Kikuyu I meet has to pay the price. This has the capacity to heighten tribal conflicts.

    Tribalism has infiltrated politics and with the advent of multiparty politics, there arose lots of tribal parties. For example FORD K is associated with the Luhya, DP – Kikuyu, FORD PEOPLE – Kisii, SPK – coastal Kenya (mijikenda), NDP/LDP – Luo, KANU/UDM – Kalenjin, SDP – Kamba and so on. Voting in Kenya whether parliamentary, civic or presidential is nowadays done purely along tribal lines as each tribe believes that it is its time to “eat” (time to enjoy political power and resources).

    In the political sphere, ‘leaders’ appeal to people of their own tribes when they want support, they also use their tribes as leverage when they bargain for positions and favours in government.

    Heightened tribalism in the country has compromised the church and rendered the religious fraternity unable to offer guidance on matters of national relevance. The church is no longer trusted to be a neutral arbiter. Various churches are allied with specific parties, for example the Presbyterian Church (PCEA) openly endorsed President Kibaki’s candidature in 2007 and urged all its followers to vote for him.

    Tribalism has been to blame for government sponsored assassinations as well as other political assassinations such as that of Tom Mboya, Robert Ouko, Othiambo Mbai and recently Hon. Melitus Mugabe Were from the Banyala community who was assassinated three weeks after winning the Embakasi parliamentary seat (in a Kikuyu dominated area).

    The previous government was fond of fuelling tribal division. It was in the habit of creating and naming rural districts with tribal names, so that the residents got to feel that the area was strictly theirs and outsiders ought to be evicted. For example Meru District for Merus, Kisii for the Kisiis, Teso District for the Tesos, Kuria for the Kurias, Suba for the Suba people and even Taita District for the Taita tribesmen. This divide and rule tactic was used during election times so that ‘outsiders’ would be evicted if they chose to vote in a different manner. For example the natives of Kisii district would feel justified to evict non Kisii people residing in ‘their’ district.

    The 2007 post election violence in Kenya is largely attributed to tribalism, due to the fact that in Kenya elections are simply a matter of life and death. The fate of entire communities is on the line. Raila Odinga (a luo) took advantage of this situation and ganged up the other 41 tribes against the Kikuyu led government of Mwai Kibaki. He mobilized political heavy weights from most of the other tribes and formed the ODM (Orange Democratic Movement).

    The Kikuyu dominated PNU (Party of National Unity) was therefore faced with a tough challenge, even though the Kikuyu tribe is the most populous in the country. ODM was too strong.

    Thus the election was never based on issues, ideologies or principles. Rather it was an avenue of voting out the Kikuyus, a showdown between the Kikuyu- led PNU versus a coalition of Kenyan tribes under the ODM umbrella.

    Violence inevitably broke out when it became clear that the election had been stolen/rigged. People from president Kibaki’s tribe were hunted down, attacked and evicted all over the country, as other citizens could just not imagine being out in the cold, jobless and with zero infrastructural development in their areas for another five years.

    The way forward

    There is no point in addressing the ills bedevilling Kenya while ignoring the actual causes, since the major cause of tribalism in Kenya (and in Africa as a whole) today is the competition and confrontation over power and resources. There must be a clear formula of sharing of power and resources via constitutional arrangements. This will ensure that there is no more skewed distribution of state resources. At that point each tribe/community might be fairly represented.

    It would also be best if power was completely devolved to regional governments – a federal type of government is the only sure way to protect small tribes from those who would wish to exploit and subjugate them. The other option would be to moot an arrangement that caters for the rotations of key posts between tribes. So far, federalism seems the better option since historically Kenyan communities have lived apart.

    It is also necessary to enforce strict laws that regulate discriminatory practices in the provision of public service.

    Tolerance is obviously a major requirement if Kenyans are to be united in diversity, so that citizens learn to accept and accommodate customs and practices that are different from theirs. For example I am Luhya. I therefore love Luhya, I was nurtured as one and it is the thing I best understand how to be. However I don’t disrespect or disregard any other group even though I see some things differently from them and would prefer some different things from theirs. God created me a Luhya and intends to keep me so. But I make a point of respecting other people’s cultures, even those who circumcise girls and even those who practice wife inheritance.

    Tribalism is a retrogressive practice, as some citizens do like demeaning others and belittling others by disrespecting and making fun of other people’s cultures and customs.

    Dehumanizing other people or simply considering them inferior is unacceptable and can degenerate into fistfights. Some of my native (Luhya) foodstuffs/vegatables such as Lisutsa, Lisaka, Murere,Likhubi are considered to be mere weeds in other parts of Kenya. Unity in diversity can only be achieved if tolerance is practiced.

    We must help citizens to learn, understand and even just get a glimpse into the cultures of other Kenyans, since this alone will wipe out myths, generalizations as well as misconceptions, skewed and limited information about other tribes/cultures.

    Building bridges across different cultures is necessary since, when standing inside our own conceptual schemes, we are blind to the possibilities of other ways of thinking, seeing, understanding, and interpreting the world.

    It would also help if international donor agencies such as the World Bank would peg all development aid to conditions such as success in instituting constitutional changes and other appropriate anti-tribal violence measures. This is vital since it is only with the eradication of tribalism that real and sustainable development can be achieved.

    If tribalism is to be successfully combated then meritocracy has to be fully embraced in both the civil service as well as the private/corporate sector. It is only the most qualified people who should be considered for job placements,. The hiring process ought to be transparent, interviews done and only the best candidates considered.

    When the issue of tribalism is adequately addressed, the main cause of the conflicts will have been defused and in time governance should improve, corruption should decrease, skilled citizens will return home, investment will be encouraged, developments will occur and living standards will most likely improve. Most importantly tribal violence will be eradicated in the country.

  4. Ethiopian Forces Lose Ground to Al-Shabaab in Somalia; Military Ramifications
    March 21 | Posted by David Goldman | Intelligence News, Military Intelligence Ethiopian troops have left positions they held in Bay and Bokool areas after Al-Shabaab militants breached their defenses. Strategic Intelligence Key Points A contingent of Al-Shabaab militants led by Sheikh Mukhtar Robow forced the Ehtiopian and Somalian army out of the city of Hudur. Al-Shabaab have regrouped and acquired new weapons to sustain new offensives in Central and Southern Somalia Militants have been recruited… Read more

  5. Francis Kimemia

    Francis Kimemia, Permanent Secretary, Ministry of State for Provincial Administration and Internal Security of the Republic of Kenya

    Francis Kimemia has had a 30 year comprehensive career in public administration, development, and peace and security management from headquarters to the grassroots.

    He is currently overseeing ongoing police reforms and restructuring Provincial Administration institutions. He has been involved in peace, disarmament and reconciliation process, creating over 100 district peace committees country-wide and strengthening community democratic policing, rule of law and civic virtues.

    Francis Kimemia holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science, Public Administration and a Master’s Degree in Business Administration.He also graduated in Luo hate degree
    at State-House in Nairobi .Kimemia is another Michuki reincarnate

  6. GEMA-NSIS -DEFENDING UHURU AT ALL COSTS TO SUCCEED KIBAKI HAS BRIBED SC JUDGES: On more serious matters, hii maneno ya 300 million for each judge (rumours as is) got me thinking… Kwani from MP’s to IEBC etc getting all that money in bribes running into billions. Where does this money come from ? Kwani it is a bottomless pit ? Kweli some kenyans have cash if indeed the rumours are true. I am not an economist so someone answer me this: doesn’t all that cash flying around do some damage to the inflation ?

    That notwithstanding, I woke up early this sunday to catch our mboys in Hong Kong kicking some portuguese ass in sevens, (yeah, take that you colonialists!!! Lol). To stay awake, I had to load my system with copious quantities of coffee so allow me to indulge my caffeine induced overactive mind and add to the theory of bribing the judges and connecting it to the ‘2.7 billion shs edict’ issued by Ruto recently.

    I would love then (if above is true hehehe) to see how the judges explain their verdict irrespective of the evidence staring them eyeball to eyeball. Maybe, evidence notwithstanding, they will sleep peacefully knowing that at least they asked for a higher price (10 million times more) than Judas Iscariot. And for a lesser Sin. That cheap bastard… By the way, how do these bribes work ? Is it negotiable ? Couldn’t they go for a higher price ? Does one judge get more than the other (thanks to his/her negotiating skills) or do they sit together and issue a blanket price ? You know!!! For the sake of FAIRNES and HONOUR amongst Judges ?

Leave a Reply

Discover more from KENYA STOCKHOLM BLOG

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading