I am just creeping back into activity after a brief lull. I spent the whole of last week “gathering information” from KSB reporters and it is unfortunate that there are some news items which have been overtaken by events and might have to be ditched. KSB is just beginning to catch up so keep yourself tuned to the channel.
The HIV positive Kenyan who was charged with raping two Swedish women and allegedly infecting them with HIV was eventually jailed for three years. According to the judgment, the Kenyan will be deported immediately after he completes his sentence after which he will be banned from entering Sweden for life. That is on top of an Ksh 8 million compensation package to a woman he allegedly infected with the HIV virus. The Kenyan was found “not guilty” on the rape charges he was facing.
This is how the Swedish justice system fools the public. Under normal circumstances, a rape charge normally carries a prison term of at least two years while the fine (compensation) normally begins at 70.000 kr (around Ksh 700.000). The Kenyan was freed of the rape charges but the sentence he was handed far much exceeds the average period in cases of rape while the fine is more than ten times the average in known rape cases which manage to attract a conviction. Observers could be relieved that he was freed of the rape charges but the big point is that the “not guilty” verdict was surpassed by the heavy penalty in terms of the jail term and the fine.
The point which the prosecution ignored completely is the question of “who might have infected who” under the shady circumstances that came up in court. The Kenyan admitted that when he arrived in Sweden, he was HIV positive, having contracted the virus after a blood transfusion in Kenya. The accused was an asylum seeker and this means that he might have tested positive when he arrived in Sweden since it is routine that all asylum seekers have to be tested for HIV and those found positive exposed to counseling where they are normally told to inform any potential sexual contact about their HIV status. They are normally advised to use condoms during any articulation and warned of serious legal consequences if they infect a Swede or anybody with the virus. When the Kenyan was charged, he could not deny his HIV status because the Swedish state already had his data.
A major weakness which was exploited by the prosecution is the fact that there was no telling whether it is the Kenyan who actually infected the Swedish woman with HIV. This is a crime which was committed two years ago but never reported immediately and what was not clear is whether the Kenyan is the only person who went to bed with the then 14 year old Swede between the time she had sex with the Kenyan and the time she tested positive.
There was no serious investigation as to whether the Swedish woman had any sexual contacts with anybody else after she spread her legs to the Kenyan because the Swedish authorities bought her version of the story – that she had no contact. It took her two good years to report the crime and it should be interesting that although she willingly accepted to strip her pants down for the Kenyan brother to consume the goods, she “closed the door” thereafter only to emerge in court with a case of “HIV infection”. Could this have been possible in the real world?
Another disturbing aspect of the case is that the Swedish woman claimed that the Kenyan had raped her at the time she was allegedly infected with HIV virus. The rape charge was dismissed by the court. By dismissing the rape aspect of the case, a logical conclusion is that the Swede lied to the Court, a very serious crime that should have raised credibility questions and reliability of evidence. How then did the court trust her when it came to transmission of the virus because the assumption was that prior to her discovery that she was HIV positive, she had only been laid by the Kenyan.
A virologist who testified at the trial told the court that it could not be ascertained that the strain of the virus the lady was carrying is the same strain the Kenyan was carrying so how did the court conclude that the Kenyan was responsible for the transmission. A Swedish girl who goes around spreading her legs at 14 years could easily fall under the bracket of a “sexmaniac”, a whore or a related category. It is therefore unlikely that for a whole 24 months before she reported the crime, she managed to keep her legs together. Could she have climaxed during another articulation where she could have absorbed the virus? These curious questions might never be answered unless something dramatic happens at the appeal level.
Surely. How could a 14 year old white Swedish girl have been raped by a dark Nigger direct from Africa then this serious crime fails to be reported to police immediately by minders or the next of kin? Where were the parents of this underage kid and in case they knew about the rape, what were they thinking about for two good years? Following the anti-African Swedish media propaganda, a rape case by a Nigger of a minor is even more serious because of the high “HIV profile” of Africans on Swedish TV screens so how comes that this crime went unreported?
The fact of the matter is that this kid was hooked in a pub. How comes that a 14 year old was zonking in a pub when the law in Sweden (and many countries) is clear that under 18s are to keep off pubs and other drinking environments?
DELIVERY OF JUSTICE IN SWEDEN IS PROPORTIONAL TO SKIN COLOUR
I have scanned through the Swedish media which reported the story but, as usual, there was no analysis. For the Swedish media, the center of interest in the story was that another Nigger who might have been infecting white Swedish girls was eventually found guilty and given the right treatment – 3 years in jail, 800.000 kr fine and deportation “For life” – good riddance!
For the Swedish public which believes the Media hype, it is time to increase “security” when it comes to romantic or sexual contacts with Africans because “look at what has happened. Another one has infected our daughter with HIV”. For the community of racists and Neo-nazi groups, it is time to push for that political agenda of expelling Africans from Sweden because they are infecting our underage girls with the lethal virus. They have no mercy. The media ensured that they mentioned that the culprit is a Kenyan. We hope that Wakenya nestling with “just seduced” Swedish women did not have to go through any HIV test or lose the bird altogether in a moment of real panic.
When a Kenyan announced through the media some years back that he was HIV positive, some Kenyan-Swedish romantic relationships entered into deep crisis while others simply collapsed. The few and lucky Kenyans who had just began the process of smooching white partners found themselves in the HIV testing line-ups to save their relationships as the impact of the revelations also took root. The damage is that the media hype about this latest unproven case might have drastically reduced the “romantic marketability” of Kenyan males in ways that cannot yet be quantified. In fact, even Kenyan girls who might have landed a whitie might discover that the new catch could be under threat because of the tension associated with the case playing itself in the media. This is the truth of the matter (Ukweli wa mambo).
The image which remains behind in the Swedish psyche with this kind of conviction is that Niggers are actually the main carriers of HIV in Sweden and that they are doing everything possible to infect innocent white Swedish girls whom they manage to dupe. Don’t worry that the girl in question was not the official girlfriend of the Kenyan ie it could have been a one night stand. The fact that she was picked up from a pub and catapulted right to the bedroom where she quickly downloaded her pants, toe off her bra and what have you should speak volumes about the character herself.
Was this Kenyan the first to have pulled this kind of move or was the girl in the pub as part of her routine pastime to look for muscles that could make her scream? It might sound like a joke but these kind of girls are known to exist in this country if only you know where to look. Was this conviction based on serious police investigations or was it based on a pre-set line of State thinking which had to end with a jail term and a huge fine to rekindle the “Africans have Aids” debate in Sweden?
It should be remembered that even before the trial began, the Swedish police were parroting on “many Swedish girls” who might have been infected by the Kenyan. These girls never came to be because the police was speculating at a time when they were supposed to have been conducting meticulous investigations.
From the start, there was something “kinky” about the whole case. The Kenyan had been married to a Swedish woman at the time of his arrest. Many Kenyans do not know him as a womanizer who could have been cruising left, right and center with his Kanta-cruise Kenyan missile, firing into every available target he could capture on his highly seductive radar screen. He had his own personal problems but he did not fit into the profile of a reckless maniac out to destroy the lives of Swedish women with the HIV virus simply because he carried the virus.
Although he was convicted and found guilty, KSB believes that there are aspects of the case which could have rendered it “untenable” if they were pursued. If you are an African taken to a Swedish court and you hear the prosecutor arguing that “we believe” what the Swede is saying, you should understand that you are going to jail.
Billy Boy, a Kenyan Rapper, was sent to jail for one year some times back for allegedly assaulting a Swedish woman. The crime was reported two years later. We were in court. The Swede alleged that she had “blue marks” on her face out of a beating but police told the court that they never saw any such marks when they arrived at the scene. The marks were never documented by a doctor either, a procedure which should have been routine especially in a case of brutality by a Nigger and in which marks had been inflicted. In the end, the court “believed the Swede” and Billy went to jail. The case of this Kenyan should be seen in a similar light.
Nobody should protect any renegade infected with HIV and transmitting it because any deliberate transmission of HIV is equal to murder. In the same token, nobody should be sent to jail on allegations which cannot be substantiated especially on the question of HIV transmission. We might be wrong. But the case of this Kenyan national deserved a closer examination because the signal it is sending to Kenyans and the wider African community is that the delivery of Justice in Sweden is proportional to the color of the skin.
Juliet Kavinga was murdered in Sweden but despite the availability of “hard evidence” to support a conviction, the Swedish suspect was set free. We have a weak case of alleged HIV transmission and the suspect has been sent to jail without critical aspects of the case getting a comprehensive examination. The question now is not why the Kenyan was sent to jail without ample evidence but who is next in the “Swedish System Of Injustice”.
Okoth Osewe
About the Author
