Martha Karua’s reintroduction of her political machine, now rechristened as the People’s Liberation Party (PLP), has injected fresh intrigue into Kenya’s dynamic political stage. Determined to dethrone President William Ruto, Karua has found a contentious partner in Rigathi Gachagua, a man who, until recently, hurled vitriol at her during the 2022 campaign season. The alliance’s complexity, however, deepens with the inclusion of Kalonzo Musyoka, the mercurial politician renowned for his “watermelon” tendencies. Kalonzo’s penchant for switching allegiances at opportune moments, often without prior notice, adds yet another layer of unpredictability to a coalition already rife with competing ambitions and ideological dissonance. Despite their shared aspiration to unsettle the status quo, Karua, Gachagua, and Kalonzo must surmount formidable institutional, financial, and personal barriers to claim any modicum of victory in the next electoral cycle.
PLP’s Resurrection and the Pursuit of Inclusivity
Karua’s transformation of her erstwhile NARC-Kenya outfit into the People’s Liberation Party signifies more than a mere name change. It represents an audacious quest to infuse Kenya’s political firmament with a platform that champions gender equity, youth empowerment, and constitutional fidelity. Historically, female politicians in Kenya have encountered a labyrinth of gender biases and cultural norms that subvert their credibility. Even though the constitution stipulates that no more than two-thirds of elective posts be occupied by one gender, the spirit of inclusion often falters amid deeply patriarchal attitudes.
During her 2022 stint as Raila Odinga’s running mate, Karua bore the brunt of disparaging commentary about her perceived lack of “aggression,” a telling indicator of the sexism that still pervades Kenyan politics. By relaunching as PLP with a signature purple hue symbolizing peace, she aims to cultivate a broader demographic, particularly disenchanted youth who have grown weary of tribal yardsticks. Yet, her ambition collides with the stark legacy of electoral underperformance. NARC-Kenya, the predecessor to PLP, failed to clinch significant parliamentary or county seats, thus earning the unflattering tag of a “briefcase party.”
Kalonzo Musyoka’s presence at the PLP launch reveals the lengths to which Karua is prepared to go in forging alliances that transcend narrow ethnic or ideological boundaries. Known for his chameleonic approach – earning him the moniker “watermelon” – Kalonzo occupies a peculiar space in Kenyan politics. He has slipped into and out of multiple coalitions over the years, often balancing precariously between rival camps. Indeed, his sudden alignment with Karua and Gachagua could signal a strategic hedge, especially if he hopes to secure Karua’s endorsement for his own presidential ambitions in 2027.
The Gachagua Reversal: From Fierce Critic to Co-Pilot
For many observers, the most jarring component of Karua’s nascent coalition is her alliance with Rigathi Gachagua, a figure who once maligned her publicly. Back in 2022, Gachagua portrayed Karua as lacking the grit to navigate high-level political combat, dismissing her as an unsuitable candidate for the deputy presidency. His discourse often mirrored the patronizing attitudes that plague women leaders who dare to aim for top-tier offices. Now, however, Gachagua has emerged as Karua’s unexpected co-pilot in an endeavor to wrest the vote-rich Mt. Kenya region away from President Ruto’s orbit.
Gachagua’s pivot stems partly from an overdue realization that the Kikuyu – the largest ethnic group in Kenya – presently lack a direct hold on the presidency or representation in government at the party level, a historic anomaly since independence. By championing what he calls the “Mt. Kenya redemption,” Gachagua aims to consolidate the region’s millions of votes behind the PLP alliance. Yet, doubts abound regarding the sincerity and durability of his newfound collaboration with Karua.
At the core, Karua’s constitutionalist ethos diverges sharply from Gachagua’s populist sloganeering. Critics surmise that the alliance is simply a transactional marriage, devoid of a unifying philosophy beyond the urgent desire to topple President Ruto. Their alliance also stands on unstable ground financially. While Gachagua possesses robust grassroots networks and potential financing avenues, Karua has historically grappled with the systemic challenge of inadequate campaign funds – a hurdle that disproportionately afflicts female aspirants in Kenya’s patriarchal society.
Adding Kalonzo Musyoka into this delicate equation amplifies the unpredictability. Gachagua, evidently cognizant of Kalonzo’s “middle path” strategy, has been wooing him in hopes of forging a formidable tri-ethnic voting bloc. The question, however, is whether Kalonzo, who once allied with Odinga and even hinted at cooperating with Ruto, can maintain unwavering loyalty to Karua and Gachagua when his own presidential aspirations beckon.
The Kalonzo Factor: Watermelon Politics in Full Display
Perhaps the most intriguing element in this unfolding drama is Kalonzo Musyoka’s mercurial presence. Dubbed “watermelon” because of his proclivity to appear green on the outside while quietly red on the inside, Kalonzo has hopscotched through political alliances with uncanny dexterity. His unannounced shifts between polarizing camps – be it leaning toward Odinga’s Orange Democratic Movement or flirting with Ruto’s power bloc – have made him a unique chameleon in Kenya’s political discourse.
By making a conspicuous appearance at Karua’s PLP launch, Kalonzo signaled that he, too, sees an opportunity in an alignment with the resurrected party. One reading suggests he might be banking on Karua’s support for his 2027 presidential gambit, hoping that her moral authority and Gachagua’s numerical clout in Mt. Kenya could give him an edge. Another perspective hints that Kalonzo is simply hedging his bets: if the Karua-Gachagua pact falters or fails to present a clear path to State House, he could abruptly pivot toward the Ruto-Raila axis, a scenario that has precedent in his storied political career.
For Karua and Gachagua, incorporating Kalonzo could be a double-edged sword. On one hand, he brings valuable networks in Ukambani and beyond, areas that might otherwise remain inaccessible to a Mt. Kenya-centric alliance. On the other hand, his notorious unpredictability threatens to undermine long-term coalition cohesion. If Kalonzo abruptly defects, the nascent alliance risks fracture and potential electoral humiliation.
Still, the troika maintains that their shared objective is to dethrone Ruto. They argue that the current administration’s alleged partiality to the new “Luo-Kalenjin-Luhya axis” disenfranchises swathes of Kenyans yearning for inclusive leadership. Karua, Gachagua, and Kalonzo all present themselves as champions of the people, transcending tribal enclaves. Yet, skepticism abounds, as their respective histories of shifting allegiances, public spats, and zero-sum calculations cast doubt on the alliance’s ideological solidity.
The Looming Tussle: Ruto, Raila, and the High-Stakes Battlefield
Meanwhile, President William Ruto marches forward with a carefully orchestrated plan to safeguard his reelection. His overtures to Raila Odinga’s Orange Democratic Movement epitomize a strategy that could realign entire swaths of the electorate. By courting Odinga -who commands a fiercely loyal base in Nyanza – Ruto attempts to position himself as an inclusive statesman, diluting the potency of any emergent opposition.
Moreover, Ruto’s government wields considerable state resources, an essential factor in Kenya’s financially intensive campaigns. Development projects, strategic appointments, and media narratives furnish him with channels to reinforce his diminishing popularity. Dismissing alternative formations as mere “noise,” he invests heavily in grassroots mobilization, hoping to capture the loyalty of rural communities that have historically delivered decisive electoral victories. Even though the ground is extremely hostile, Ruto is banking on Raila’s “magic wand” to turn the tide around in his favour.
In this climate, the alliance of Karua, Gachagua, and Kalonzo faces an intimidating confluence of obstacles. Firstly, the synergy among these three leaders is far from assured. Gachagua’s populist bravado could clash with Karua’s constitutional sobriety; Kalonzo’s unpredictability could sabotage months of diligent coalition-building. Secondly, financial constraints loom large, particularly for Karua, who has repeatedly emphasized the difficulties women aspirants encounter in securing campaign resources.
Finally, the potential for infiltration or betrayal remains a real threat. Kenyan politics is notorious for quiet deals and last-minute defections. If any party in the triumvirate senses a more promising route through Ruto – or even a sudden official handshake with Raila – an exodus could ensue, leaving the PLP project in disarray. Despite these vulnerabilities, the alliance’s members persist in brandishing their commitment to a “liberation” narrative that aims to champion constitutional reforms, target disillusioned youth, and end the alleged ethnic favoritism entrenched in official corridors.
Should they rally behind a coherent, nationally resonant manifesto – and if they can steer clear of incessant internal wrangling – they may yet morph into a formidable counterweight to Ruto’s juggernaut. Kalonzo’s presence, for all his ideological fluidity, could serve as a linchpin if his networks are brought into productive alignment with the rest of the coalition. But whether he remains steadfast or takes flight toward more enticing prospects is a question that casts a sizable shadow over the group’s prospects.
In short, the alliance stands atop a precarious tightrope, balancing ephemeral unity against the gravitational pull of realpolitik. Karua, Gachagua, and Kalonzo have a momentous journey ahead as they strive to reorder Kenya’s political calculus before 2027. Their combined strengths – Karua’s reformist credibility, Gachagua’s grassroots muscle, and Kalonzo’s capacity to bridge fault lines – may generate genuine momentum if deployed strategically. Yet, the swirling winds of Kenyan politics, characterized by abrupt betrayals and elaborate power plays, could just as easily sweep the troika into oblivion.
Given the complexities of alliance-building and the centrifugal forces of shifting loyalties, it remains to be seen whether this new experiment will thrive or fracture under the weight of conflicting ambitions or whether Kenyans will witness yet another seamless Kalonzo pivot. The stage is set, the actors are poised, and the nation watches with bated breath as the ensuing drama unfolds under Kenya’s electrifying political lights. Welcome to Kenya 2027 “politricks”!
Okoth Osewe
About the Author
