Long distance governing made easy via the VIP governing package version 2013 specially designed for “At Large Prezzos and Their Deputies”. Sack employees via the delete key! Digitally, sign documents online! Visit the whole country via google maps and store top government secrets in encrypted files in iCloud or Drop box with the new features in Skype’s Long Distance Governing package! Bonus: Real time 3D Skyped conferences with the Cabinet anytime, any day! Experience the 21st century high-tech leadership capabilities all linked powerfully in cyberspace. It’s never been so easy to run a country remotely. Just a click away and you have a running nation. Perfect for ICC suspects elected in Office against all odds. Order today!
Be strong Mr.president.I trust in you and trust that all will come clean.Usijali na propaganda ya watu ju it will always be there.Skype pia isikushtue ju tushazoea kutumia hapa kama asylsökande na bado mapeps zikatoka.Its just a matter of time and by the end of the day,u are even stronger and smarter.I wake up every morning and all i see on my braekfast table is :UK TOSHA !!
Once more, are you hinting at the possibility of Uhuru Kenyatta governing Kenya by remote control all the way from the ICC headquarters in the Hague? Well, at least now that could be technically feasible, if he is elected. This is the age of science and technology!
By the way Okoth, I was very impressed by Uhuru Kenyatta’s performance at the first presidential debate for the nation’s presidential aspirants. At this point I’ve only watched the first 40 minutes – will be watching the rest tonight – and I hope that he continues in that mode: focused, concise and clear. I now understand that the al-Jazeera interviewer repeatedly obstructed him in that al-Jazeera interview, with her many interruptions of what he was about to say…..
KSB: Cornelius, great to hear from you once again. I am one of those who think that ruling Kenya from the Hague will be mission impossible but let us wait and see. Watch the rest of the debate then we can engage. Regards.
Presidential Debate:
Why Karua, Muite And Peter Kenneth Had To Face Mt Kenya
Peter Kenneth, Paul Muite, and Martha Karua who were previously thought of as a progressive, suddenly became Uhuru apologists. They suddenly reared their tribal head. And viewers saw it.
Rumor had it they met before the debate, but I doubt it.
The formation of the 4 UK, PM, MK, and PK it seems was united in bringing one man down- Raila Odinga.
Even though they may be well meaning, they are all part of the players in the Uhuru succession. They are smart; they know that Uhuru’s political career will begin to nosedive, after the elections, whatever the outcome. So they don’t want to antagonize the Mount Kenya base.
Uhuru’s is probably going to jail unless Raila becomes President and he marshals his local and international troops to bring the cases back home. So as observed in the debate Muite, Karua, and Peter Kenneth are positioning themselves. They are praying, salivating and hoping that Uhuru goes to jail. Karua as Justice Minister actually actively assembled the evidence that nailed Uhuru with a keen eye of shoving aside her competition in Mt Kenya.
The Uhuru succession in Mt Kenya is shaping up, given his legal predicaments, it’s a matter of when not if, when Uhuru gets succeeded. Throw in Kimunya and it will be a messy succession.
Karua, Muite and Kenneth are convinced that once Uhuru is convicted his wealth will be frozen by the ICC therefore unable to launch a meaningful campaign even if set free after just three years. This development will give them an opportunity in 2018 to control the tribal numbers; this is why they had to support Uhuru in the debate, just to send that crucial signal to the Kikuyu nation.
The three pretended to be Uhuru’s friends in the debate, but in actual fact, Karua, Kenneth, Muite are sadistic vultures waiting to harvest from his travails at The Hague. Actually Karua’s game plan was that Uhuru is out of 2013 election, but as usual the Kenyan courts keep postponing it.
The three are said to have celebrated at the fall of Mugumo tree with each of them parading old wazee to give interpretation of what a waits the community.
That formation of the three Mt. Kenya musketeers is about succession. No other region has attracted such a huge number of candidates. It’s because, they all want to succeed Uhuru, because he is going, as confirmed by the fall of the Mugumo tree.
He will either go broke, or he will be in jail by 2018. By then Dida would have a bigger war chest because, who knows, Raila might make him a Minister for being on the side of the people in the debate.
Uhuru Kenyatta (only in kenya mass-muderers can rule using Skype)Whitemans technology !
Why must President Kibaki be replaced by another Kikuyu as 4th Kenyas President?
Why not another Son from kenyas tribe who can be elected after Kibaki presidency?
Are Kenyan People Bongos (Wapubavus) Mavi mya Kuku as vkibaki calls them?
It is an open secret in Kenya the Kikuyus are indoctrinated from their youth that Kenya belongs to them and only kikuyus who fought British colonialists and drove them from Kenya liberating other sleeping tribes of Kenya.
The oath kikuyus took after killing of Hon: T Mboya (Luo) in 1969 still binds Kikuyu folks and brainwashes their minds.
Kenyan court clears Kenyatta for presidential bid, despite war crime charges
The International Criminal Court ruled that Uhuru Kenyatta was one of those ‘most responsible’ for Kenya’s 2007 post-election violence. But that won’t stop him from running for president.
By Whitney Eulich
posted February 15, 2013 at 8:47 am EST
• A daily summary of global reports on security issues.
Kenya’s high court ruled today that former finance minister Uhuru Kenyatta is eligible to run for the presidency next month, despite claims that he is ineligible due to charges of crimes against humanity.
On March 4, Kenya will hold its first presidential election since 2007, when the disputed victory of President Mwai Kibaki led to weeks of violence, more than 1,200 deaths, and some 300,000 people displaced from their homes, reported The Christian Science Monitor at the time. Mr. Kenyatta and his running mate William Ruto are both accused of inciting the unrest, and were deemed a part of those “most responsible” for the post-election ethnic violence, according to former head prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC), Luis Moreno Ocampo. Both men have denied wrongdoing.
Polls put Kenyatta in a close second behind Prime Minister Raila Odinga, Reuters reports. If he wins Kenya’s presidency, he will be the second sitting president facing trial at the ICC in The Hague, according to a separate Reuters report. Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir is facing trial for war crimes in the Darfur region, and after rebuffing the ICC, he faces an international arrest warrant. He has cost his country more than $450 million in international development funds.
There could also be diplomatic and economic repercussions for Kenya – East Africa’s strongest economy – if it elects someone charged by the ICC:
Several embassies in Nairobi told Reuters it cannot be business as usual when dealing with an ICC indictee.
But they will be reluctant to unravel long-held diplomatic, trade and military ties with one of Africa’s more stable democracies and an anchor of stability in a volatile area….
“Choices have consequences,” [United States] Assistant Secretary Johnnie Carson said, hammering home the same point at least five times during a 40-minute conference call.
Carson did not mention names but the message was clear: there would be implications for Kenya’s relations with the world if the Kenyatta-Ruto alliance wins.
“We live in an interconnected world and people should be thoughtful about the impact that their choices have on their nation, on their region, on the economy,” Carson said.
The Kenyan court’s ruling, determined by a panel of five judges, said it lacked “jurisdiction to deal with a question relating to the election of a president,” according to Kenya-based Capital FM News. That decision must be made by the Supreme Court, though it is unclear if today’s decision will be appealed considering the election is only three weeks away.
The NGOs that brought the case to the high court “argued that … any person committed to trial at The Hague-based ICC would not be able to properly carry out their duties of running the country, while the honor and integrity of the public office would also be damaged,” reports Capital FM News.
Kenyatta’s supporters celebrated in the streets after the court’s ruling was announced, reports the BBC.
Per Kenyan election law, if no candidate wins an absolute majority on March 4, there will be a second round of voting. Many predict this scenario will play out, and that Kenyatta will face Mr. Odinga in the second-round vote.
However, barring any delays, Kenyatta and Mr. Ruto’s ICC trials would start just days after the runoff. According to Reuters:
Kenyatta and Ruto both say they intend to comply with their summonses to appear before the court in The Hague and answer charges. But if Kenyatta wins the vote, many Kenyans expect him to refuse to appear, like Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who spurned the court when it charged him with war crimes over the conflict in Sudan’s Darfur region.
To be sincere this blog is part of the blogs encouraging tribalism.. Bt you know what ?the one God has choosen shall never be defeated.. I’m ready for any new president from which ever part of kenya .bt why can’t you preach peace for once..
KSB: TNA Damu, can you explain or give examples about your allegation? The post you are commenting on is an advert promoting a new software that can help ICC suspects rule from their cells in the Hague instead of not ruling at all. If, for example, Uhuru is elected, there will be no peace in Kenya if he cannot rule and promoting the “Long Distance Governing” software is one good way of helping peace to thrive in Kenya after election. Back to you.
it is ridiculous for uhururuto to pursue reckless power in Kenya roof personal self inflicted burden of icc.uhuru was in kanu how did he end up an appendage of kibaki power matrix to be dpm and finance minister and hague bound as accused ?what prominent role did he play in bungled elections in 2007 ? uhuru knows why he carries the cross but they shouldn’t saddle Kenyans and Kenya to Hague with them.its pathological delusions of dictators to hthink they embody support of the nation.delve into minds of moi,mobuto,mugabe,saddam,assad,hitler etc you see the same story but the result is always misery and dungeon.
as for karuua,kenneth and muite all must be seen as part of uhuru kibaki master plan to scuttle rail win.divide votes elsewhere and leave all mt kenya votes to uhuru.it is all spoiler game.distract oothers but safeguard our mt kenya votes.hood wink the reast and let uhuru take over power after buying ruto,ngilu,balala and musalia.it willbe hard for them to cheat people come 2017.
the one God has choosen shall never be defeated.. I’m ready for any new president from which ever part of kenya .bt why can’t you preach peace for once..
Hawa Wachenzi na huyu God wao? Which God (Of meteorites 9 that falls to Russia? as if Gods house in heaven is falling apart?
Ruto atakuliwa na Uhuru >harafu >Damp the bloody -Lumbwa> it mere propaganda or there is truth to it? Some unknown people have edited widely distributed a paper that contains political analyst Mutahi Ngunyi’s tyranny of numbers to show that there is a plan by TNA to get rid of Jubilee running mate William Ruto if the alliance wins the elections. A document sent to Corridors of Power on Thursday, which Ngunyi has categorically denied knowledge of, claims that Ruto is “a very ambitious and abrasive person who will want a lot of say in the running of the government and we risk having two centres of power”. According to the document, which contains glaring spelling mistakes, the plan will be to find ways of fast-tracking some of the land cases Ruto is facing and forcing him to step aside. Once that happens Ruto will be replaced by former Mvita MP Najib Balala who is described as weak and friendly. To collapse the 50-50 power sharing deal with URP, the purported plan is proposing that TNA uses Ruto’s enemies to reject all his nominees in parliament
Ruto will be coned by Uhuru and will be trated like this poor Kikuyu woman from Naivasha>
Naivasha, Kenya: Supporters of a TNA aspirant demonstrated in Naivasha to protest a move by the party’s tribunal to revoke their candidate’s nomination.
Transport and business were paralysed in parts of the lakeside town by the protestors.
They were protesting the move by the tribunal to revoke the nomination of Esther Njeri who is vying for the Viwandani ward seat on a TNA ticket.
Njeri who is a former nominated councilor won in the TNA primaries but a case challenging her eligibility to vie for the seat was forwarded to the tribunal which revoked her nomination.
The certificate was later awarded to her main challenger Stephen Kihonge who was cleared by the IEBC to vie for the seat.
According to the supporters, Njeri won with a large margin and wondered the motive by her rivals to oust her from the seat.
They warned of voter apathy for TNA if she would not be in the ballot in the general elections.
Speaking to the press, Njeri said that the court case filed over her nomination was heard ad determined but the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission was yet to clear her to contest.
Njeri warned that she would marshal her supporters to boycott voting during the elections if her name would not be in the ballot.
She called on the various women organizations to intervene and have the issue resolved saying her right to contest has been violated.
Speaking on phone Kihonge said he had been duly cleared by IEBC to vie for the seat following an order from the disputes tribunal.
Kimemia who was transferring DCs and interdicting DOs after they failed on his instructions to rig Wambui out in favour of Jimmy Kibaki’s choice? Kimemia who has been reduced to instructing the presidential guard to bar Wambui from sharing a dais with Kibaki, the father of her children, in a school she fund-raised for, in a constituency where she has won the popular nominations vote for the party of the region? –Think about his mental statuts!
Kimemia is an administrative joke. A cartoon. I rate his mental aptitude low. Just the kind who could try a coup –a semi civilian one at that.
Be strong Mr.president.I trust in you and trust that all will come clean.Usijali na propaganda ya watu ju it will always be there.Skype pia isikushtue ju tushazoea kutumia hapa kama asylsökande na bado mapeps zikatoka.Its just a matter of time and by the end of the day,u are even stronger and smarter.I wake up every morning and all i see on my braekfast table is :UK TOSHA !!
Once more, are you hinting at the possibility of Uhuru Kenyatta governing Kenya by remote control all the way from the ICC headquarters in the Hague? Well, at least now that could be technically feasible, if he is elected. This is the age of science and technology!
By the way Okoth, I was very impressed by Uhuru Kenyatta’s performance at the first presidential debate for the nation’s presidential aspirants. At this point I’ve only watched the first 40 minutes – will be watching the rest tonight – and I hope that he continues in that mode: focused, concise and clear. I now understand that the al-Jazeera interviewer repeatedly obstructed him in that al-Jazeera interview, with her many interruptions of what he was about to say…..
KSB: Cornelius, great to hear from you once again. I am one of those who think that ruling Kenya from the Hague will be mission impossible but let us wait and see. Watch the rest of the debate then we can engage. Regards.
Presidential Debate:
Why Karua, Muite And Peter Kenneth Had To Face Mt Kenya
Peter Kenneth, Paul Muite, and Martha Karua who were previously thought of as a progressive, suddenly became Uhuru apologists. They suddenly reared their tribal head. And viewers saw it.
Rumor had it they met before the debate, but I doubt it.
The formation of the 4 UK, PM, MK, and PK it seems was united in bringing one man down- Raila Odinga.
Even though they may be well meaning, they are all part of the players in the Uhuru succession. They are smart; they know that Uhuru’s political career will begin to nosedive, after the elections, whatever the outcome. So they don’t want to antagonize the Mount Kenya base.
Uhuru’s is probably going to jail unless Raila becomes President and he marshals his local and international troops to bring the cases back home. So as observed in the debate Muite, Karua, and Peter Kenneth are positioning themselves. They are praying, salivating and hoping that Uhuru goes to jail. Karua as Justice Minister actually actively assembled the evidence that nailed Uhuru with a keen eye of shoving aside her competition in Mt Kenya.
The Uhuru succession in Mt Kenya is shaping up, given his legal predicaments, it’s a matter of when not if, when Uhuru gets succeeded. Throw in Kimunya and it will be a messy succession.
Karua, Muite and Kenneth are convinced that once Uhuru is convicted his wealth will be frozen by the ICC therefore unable to launch a meaningful campaign even if set free after just three years. This development will give them an opportunity in 2018 to control the tribal numbers; this is why they had to support Uhuru in the debate, just to send that crucial signal to the Kikuyu nation.
The three pretended to be Uhuru’s friends in the debate, but in actual fact, Karua, Kenneth, Muite are sadistic vultures waiting to harvest from his travails at The Hague. Actually Karua’s game plan was that Uhuru is out of 2013 election, but as usual the Kenyan courts keep postponing it.
The three are said to have celebrated at the fall of Mugumo tree with each of them parading old wazee to give interpretation of what a waits the community.
That formation of the three Mt. Kenya musketeers is about succession. No other region has attracted such a huge number of candidates. It’s because, they all want to succeed Uhuru, because he is going, as confirmed by the fall of the Mugumo tree.
He will either go broke, or he will be in jail by 2018. By then Dida would have a bigger war chest because, who knows, Raila might make him a Minister for being on the side of the people in the debate.
Uhuru Kenyatta (only in kenya mass-muderers can rule using Skype)Whitemans technology !
Why must President Kibaki be replaced by another Kikuyu as 4th Kenyas President?
Why not another Son from kenyas tribe who can be elected after Kibaki presidency?
Are Kenyan People Bongos (Wapubavus) Mavi mya Kuku as vkibaki calls them?
It is an open secret in Kenya the Kikuyus are indoctrinated from their youth that Kenya belongs to them and only kikuyus who fought British colonialists and drove them from Kenya liberating other sleeping tribes of Kenya.
The oath kikuyus took after killing of Hon: T Mboya (Luo) in 1969 still binds Kikuyu folks and brainwashes their minds.
HILARIOUS !!!!!!!!!
(But Kimemia-IG-Hate Speech Tzar- will determine if this advert constitutes hate speech.)
KSB: If Kimemia does that, KSB will wait and petition Uhuru (if he wins) via email in the Hague to fire him via delete. Simple.
Enjoy Slave resisting Master who owns them>
http://www.youtube.com/embed/KKbvmos9J3E?autoplay=1&rel=0
Kenyans will soon Wake -Up and about the wherebouts of Uhuruto as sometimes back the people of Ivory Coast woked-up only to read how Their President Residence was stormed at night by French Foreign Legionaires(Commandos) and arrested Gbagbo after molesting and humiliating him&wife.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/cotedivoire/8925053/Former-Ivory-Coast-president-Laurent-Gbagbo-on-crimes-against-humanity-charges-at-The-Hague.html
The Christian Science Monitor – CSMonitor.com
Terrorism & Security
Kenyan court clears Kenyatta for presidential bid, despite war crime charges
The International Criminal Court ruled that Uhuru Kenyatta was one of those ‘most responsible’ for Kenya’s 2007 post-election violence. But that won’t stop him from running for president.
By Whitney Eulich
posted February 15, 2013 at 8:47 am EST
• A daily summary of global reports on security issues.
Kenya’s high court ruled today that former finance minister Uhuru Kenyatta is eligible to run for the presidency next month, despite claims that he is ineligible due to charges of crimes against humanity.
On March 4, Kenya will hold its first presidential election since 2007, when the disputed victory of President Mwai Kibaki led to weeks of violence, more than 1,200 deaths, and some 300,000 people displaced from their homes, reported The Christian Science Monitor at the time. Mr. Kenyatta and his running mate William Ruto are both accused of inciting the unrest, and were deemed a part of those “most responsible” for the post-election ethnic violence, according to former head prosecutor for the International Criminal Court (ICC), Luis Moreno Ocampo. Both men have denied wrongdoing.
Polls put Kenyatta in a close second behind Prime Minister Raila Odinga, Reuters reports. If he wins Kenya’s presidency, he will be the second sitting president facing trial at the ICC in The Hague, according to a separate Reuters report. Sudan’s Omar al-Bashir is facing trial for war crimes in the Darfur region, and after rebuffing the ICC, he faces an international arrest warrant. He has cost his country more than $450 million in international development funds.
There could also be diplomatic and economic repercussions for Kenya – East Africa’s strongest economy – if it elects someone charged by the ICC:
Several embassies in Nairobi told Reuters it cannot be business as usual when dealing with an ICC indictee.
But they will be reluctant to unravel long-held diplomatic, trade and military ties with one of Africa’s more stable democracies and an anchor of stability in a volatile area….
“Choices have consequences,” [United States] Assistant Secretary Johnnie Carson said, hammering home the same point at least five times during a 40-minute conference call.
Carson did not mention names but the message was clear: there would be implications for Kenya’s relations with the world if the Kenyatta-Ruto alliance wins.
“We live in an interconnected world and people should be thoughtful about the impact that their choices have on their nation, on their region, on the economy,” Carson said.
The Kenyan court’s ruling, determined by a panel of five judges, said it lacked “jurisdiction to deal with a question relating to the election of a president,” according to Kenya-based Capital FM News. That decision must be made by the Supreme Court, though it is unclear if today’s decision will be appealed considering the election is only three weeks away.
The NGOs that brought the case to the high court “argued that … any person committed to trial at The Hague-based ICC would not be able to properly carry out their duties of running the country, while the honor and integrity of the public office would also be damaged,” reports Capital FM News.
Kenyatta’s supporters celebrated in the streets after the court’s ruling was announced, reports the BBC.
Per Kenyan election law, if no candidate wins an absolute majority on March 4, there will be a second round of voting. Many predict this scenario will play out, and that Kenyatta will face Mr. Odinga in the second-round vote.
However, barring any delays, Kenyatta and Mr. Ruto’s ICC trials would start just days after the runoff. According to Reuters:
Kenyatta and Ruto both say they intend to comply with their summonses to appear before the court in The Hague and answer charges. But if Kenyatta wins the vote, many Kenyans expect him to refuse to appear, like Sudanese President Omar Hassan al-Bashir, who spurned the court when it charged him with war crimes over the conflict in Sudan’s Darfur region.
If a newly-elected Kenyatta were to refuse to appear before the ICC, “you don’t need a PhD in international relations to know the options open to us,” a Western diplomat said, predicting serious consequences.
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/terrorism-security/2013/0215/Kenyan-court-clears-Kenyatta-for-presidential-bid-despite-war-crime-charges
To be sincere this blog is part of the blogs encouraging tribalism.. Bt you know what ?the one God has choosen shall never be defeated.. I’m ready for any new president from which ever part of kenya .bt why can’t you preach peace for once..
KSB: TNA Damu, can you explain or give examples about your allegation? The post you are commenting on is an advert promoting a new software that can help ICC suspects rule from their cells in the Hague instead of not ruling at all. If, for example, Uhuru is elected, there will be no peace in Kenya if he cannot rule and promoting the “Long Distance Governing” software is one good way of helping peace to thrive in Kenya after election. Back to you.
it is ridiculous for uhururuto to pursue reckless power in Kenya roof personal self inflicted burden of icc.uhuru was in kanu how did he end up an appendage of kibaki power matrix to be dpm and finance minister and hague bound as accused ?what prominent role did he play in bungled elections in 2007 ? uhuru knows why he carries the cross but they shouldn’t saddle Kenyans and Kenya to Hague with them.its pathological delusions of dictators to hthink they embody support of the nation.delve into minds of moi,mobuto,mugabe,saddam,assad,hitler etc you see the same story but the result is always misery and dungeon.
as for karuua,kenneth and muite all must be seen as part of uhuru kibaki master plan to scuttle rail win.divide votes elsewhere and leave all mt kenya votes to uhuru.it is all spoiler game.distract oothers but safeguard our mt kenya votes.hood wink the reast and let uhuru take over power after buying ruto,ngilu,balala and musalia.it willbe hard for them to cheat people come 2017.
the one God has choosen shall never be defeated.. I’m ready for any new president from which ever part of kenya .bt why can’t you preach peace for once..
Hawa Wachenzi na huyu God wao? Which God (Of meteorites 9 that falls to Russia? as if Gods house in heaven is falling apart?
http://www.aljazeera.com/programmes/activate/2012/10/20121014131845553631.html
Ruto atakuliwa na Uhuru >harafu >Damp the bloody -Lumbwa> it mere propaganda or there is truth to it? Some unknown people have edited widely distributed a paper that contains political analyst Mutahi Ngunyi’s tyranny of numbers to show that there is a plan by TNA to get rid of Jubilee running mate William Ruto if the alliance wins the elections. A document sent to Corridors of Power on Thursday, which Ngunyi has categorically denied knowledge of, claims that Ruto is “a very ambitious and abrasive person who will want a lot of say in the running of the government and we risk having two centres of power”. According to the document, which contains glaring spelling mistakes, the plan will be to find ways of fast-tracking some of the land cases Ruto is facing and forcing him to step aside. Once that happens Ruto will be replaced by former Mvita MP Najib Balala who is described as weak and friendly. To collapse the 50-50 power sharing deal with URP, the purported plan is proposing that TNA uses Ruto’s enemies to reject all his nominees in parliament
Is it true Kikuyus will rule forever in Kenya?
Ruto will be coned by Uhuru and will be trated like this poor Kikuyu woman from Naivasha>
Naivasha, Kenya: Supporters of a TNA aspirant demonstrated in Naivasha to protest a move by the party’s tribunal to revoke their candidate’s nomination.
Transport and business were paralysed in parts of the lakeside town by the protestors.
They were protesting the move by the tribunal to revoke the nomination of Esther Njeri who is vying for the Viwandani ward seat on a TNA ticket.
Njeri who is a former nominated councilor won in the TNA primaries but a case challenging her eligibility to vie for the seat was forwarded to the tribunal which revoked her nomination.
The certificate was later awarded to her main challenger Stephen Kihonge who was cleared by the IEBC to vie for the seat.
According to the supporters, Njeri won with a large margin and wondered the motive by her rivals to oust her from the seat.
They warned of voter apathy for TNA if she would not be in the ballot in the general elections.
Speaking to the press, Njeri said that the court case filed over her nomination was heard ad determined but the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission was yet to clear her to contest.
Njeri warned that she would marshal her supporters to boycott voting during the elections if her name would not be in the ballot.
She called on the various women organizations to intervene and have the issue resolved saying her right to contest has been violated.
Speaking on phone Kihonge said he had been duly cleared by IEBC to vie for the seat following an order from the disputes tribunal.
Kimemia who was transferring DCs and interdicting DOs after they failed on his instructions to rig Wambui out in favour of Jimmy Kibaki’s choice? Kimemia who has been reduced to instructing the presidential guard to bar Wambui from sharing a dais with Kibaki, the father of her children, in a school she fund-raised for, in a constituency where she has won the popular nominations vote for the party of the region? –Think about his mental statuts!
Kimemia is an administrative joke. A cartoon. I rate his mental aptitude low. Just the kind who could try a coup –a semi civilian one at that.
Read more: http://jukwaa.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=6727&page=7#ixzz2LKVISxRP